PONTIAC, Mich. — A jury on Thursday convicted James Crumbley of involuntary manslaughter in connection with his teenage son’s deadly school shooting in 2021, in step with his wife, who was found guilty last month on the same charge.
The jury’s decision after about 10 hours of deliberations caps a landmark case that for the first time in the U.S. held the parents of a mass school shooter criminally responsible. James and Jennifer Crumbley’s son, Ethan, who was 15 when he opened fire at Oxford High School in suburban Detroit, pleaded guilty as an adult and was sentenced in December to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
“These were egregious facts in this case. These parents could have prevented this tragedy. It was foreseeable,” Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald said after the verdict.
“With just the smallest of efforts, they could have prevented this shooting and saved these kids’ lives,” she said.
James Crumbley, 47, faces up to 15 years in prison per the four counts of involuntary manslaughter, each one representing a murdered student. Jennifer Crumbley, 45, will be sentenced in April.
Prosecutors said James Crumbley had bought Ethan a 9 mm Sig Sauer as a gift a day after Thanksgiving, at a difficult time in his son’s life when he was struggling emotionally because his best friend had moved away. Crumbley is not accused of knowing about the attack beforehand, which his son had warned about in journal entries.
His attorney, Mariell Lehman, said after the verdict that James Crumbley “did not know that his son could or would harm anyone or that he had obtained the means to do so. James feels terrible about what happened that day to Hana St. Juliana, Madisyn Baldwin, Tate Myre, Justin Shilling, and the many others affected.”
Parents of the four children killed spoke after the guilty verdict and said no other parent should have to go through what they have.
“We can put people on the moon, we can build skyscrapers, huge monuments like the Hoover Dam — and we can’t keep our kids safe in schools,” Steve St. Juliana, the father of Hana, said. “I think people just need to wake up and take action. Stop accepting the excuses.”
Some of the parents also said the school failed their children, and called for change in leadership.
An attorney for Jennifer Crumble, Shannon Smith, declined to comment after Thursday’s verdict.
“We believe the victims, their families, and the community need and deserve the space and time to begin healing from this tragedy,” Smith said.
While the cases against the husband and wife largely mirrored each other — with many of the same witnesses testifying in both trials — prosecutors did not delve as deeply into James Crumbley’s social and work life. Testimony took less than a week, and Crumbley did not take the stand in his own defense, like Jennifer Crumbley had.
His actions in the lead-up to and the day of the shooting played a vital role. School staff testified that the Crumbleys were called to Oxford High that morning about a drawing made by their son depicting a gun and a person shot. The parents didn’t tell school officials he had access to a weapon and said they couldn’t take him back home that day, saying they had work.
A computer crimes expert testified that James Crumbley had not begun his DoorDash delivery job until after the meeting and that when he started taking orders, he drove by the family’s home four times — with the prosecution suggesting he had the opportunity to check on the gun and ensure it was safely secured.
Crumbley later told investigators he hid the 9 mm handgun in an armoire and placed the ammunition underneath jeans in another drawer.
Ethan Crumbley would go on to kill four students: Justin Shilling; Madisyn Baldwin, 17; Tate Myre, 16; and Hana St. Juliana, 14.
During closing arguments Wednesday, McDonald, the prosecutor, said the deaths were “preventable and foreseeable” if Crumbley had done any number of “tragically small efforts,” and she attempted to undercut the defense by telling jurors that parents can be responsible gun owners no matter if their child is planning a mass shooting.
“This case is not a statement about guns. It’s not a statement about parental responsibility. It’s not a case about kids doing kid things,” she said.
